Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30274 (CHH)

HIRA SINGH v. DASHRI BAI

WPC/4614/2023 · 2026-07-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010355582023 2026:CGHC:33276 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4614 of 2023 1 - Hira Singh S/o Late Shri Bisru Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Tekari, Patwari Halka No. 97, Tahsil Dharsiva District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Prem Singh S/o Late Shri Bisru Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Tekari, Patwari Halka No. 97, Tahsil Dharsiva District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Uttam Kumar S/o Late Shri Bisru Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Tekari, Patwari Halka No. 97, Tahsil Dharsiva District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Usha Bai D/o Late Shri Bisru Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Tekari, Patwari Halka No. 97, Tahsil Dharsiva District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Ramshila Bai W/o Late Shri Bisru Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Tekari, Patwari Halka No. 97, Tahsil Dharsiva District Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Dasru S/o Late Shri Firangi Satnami Aged About 80 Years R/o Village Tekari, Patwari Halka No. 97, Tahsil Dharsiva District Raipur (C.G.) 7 - Basant Bai D/o Late Shri Firangi Satnami Aged About 78 Years R/o Village Tekari, Patwari Halka No. 97, Tahsil Dharsiva District Raipur (C.G.) 8 - Dasant Bai D/o Late Shri Firangi Satnami Aged About 74 Years R/o Village Tekari, Patwari Halka No. 97, Tahsil Dharsiva District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Dashri Bai D/o Late Shri Firangi Satnami Aged About 72 Years R/o Village Tekari, Patwari Halka No. 97, Tahsil Dharsiva District Raipur (C.G.) Through Power Of Attorney Holder Sant Kumar Khunte, S/o Ramswaroop Khunte, R/o Village Chingriya, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - The Board Of Revenue Circuit Court, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Commissioner (Revenue) Division Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Collector District Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) District Raipur (C.G.) 7 - Tahsildar District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) No. 1 : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Abhyudhay Tripathi, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 31/07/2026 1. None appears for the petitioner to argue the case even in second round, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat