- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010393122025 NC: 2026:KHC:37121 WP No. 17794 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 17794 OF 2025 (LA-UDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.T K VEDAMURTHY D/O LATE KARIBASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT THEVACHANAHALLI VILLAGE, GONDHI CHATNAHALLI POST, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT.577201 2. SMT.K.N.PREMA W/O LATE T.K. RAJSHEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT BEHIND BSM GIRL HOSTEL RAJAJINAGAR, BIRURU, BIRURU TALUK, 577116 CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT. BOTH ARE REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, MOHAMED ASIF MUJEER SIDDIQUE, S/O LATE M. NAZEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT 3RD CROSS, 1ST STAGE, BEHIND BHARATHIYA SABHABHAVAN, R.M.L LAYOUT, SHIVAMOGGA CITY.577201. 3. SRI. KANTHARAJU.V.M, S/O MANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT THEVACHANAHALLI VILLAGE, GONDHI CHATNAHALLI POST, Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010393122025 NC: 2026:KHC:37121 WP No. 17794 of 2025 SHIVAMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT 577201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI.KANTHARAJAPPA M G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, SHIVAMOGGA -BHADRAVATHI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, 100, FEET ROAD, VINOBANAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA.577201. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER SHIVAMOGGA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SHIVAMOGGA 577201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.POOJA M KOORSE, HCGP FOR R1; SRI.A.V.GANGADARAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN NO.SHINAPRA/BHUSWA/CR-3145/2024- 25 DATED 24.03.2025 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-H TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010393122025 NC: 2026:KHC:37121 WP No. 17794 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 08.07.2026 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 2. Office has raised an objection that signature of the petitioner is not forthcoming on the memo. However, since the learned counsel for the petitioner is authorized to withdraw the writ petition, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. However, the liberty sought for to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action is rejected. If the petitioner has any right to file a writ petition on a different cause of action subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the petitioner is always at liberty to file a fresh petition. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9