1 CGHC010182162023 2026:CGHC:32951 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2583 of 2023 1 - Shankar Lal S/o Chaituram Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Sahda, Tahsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 2 - Fandu Ram S/o Rooprai Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Sahda, Tahsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 3 - Tulsi S/o Gandhi Ram Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Sahda, Tahsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 4 - Homram S/o Baishakhuram Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Sahda, Tahsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 5 - Harilal S/o Rooprai Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Sahda, Tahsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 6 - Pusau S/o Kamal Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Sahda, Tahsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector District Balodabazar, Office Of District Collector Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 3 - Tahsildar Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 4 - Gram Panchayat Sahda Through Secretary, Gram Panchayat Sahda, Block And Tahsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 5 - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Sahda, Block And Tahsil Palari, District RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 6 - Uma Sahu W/o Uttam Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Sahda, Tahsil Palari District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh (Sarpanch) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anchal Kumar Matre, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/07/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 declare construction of new Cattle Space (Gowthaan) as illegal and prohibit the respondent authorities from its further construction. 10.2 restrain the respondent authorities from forcefully evicting the land in possession of petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh in case exigency arises. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat