Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30245 (CHH)

NAVRATARN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3956/2026 · 2026-07-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010292912026 2026:CGHC:33268 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3956 of 2026 1 - Navratarn S/o Ramcharan Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Kataod, Tehsil Dabhra, District Sakti Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Department Of Water Resource, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector District Sakti Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Cum Land Acquisition Officer Dabhara, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 5 - Executive Engineer Janjgir Division Head Office At Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 31.07.2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents for conducting spot inspection and once it is found that the land of the petitioners is coming under submergence they may be directed to initiate acquisition proceeding and conclude the same within time frame. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent for also granting interest under Section 80 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 from the date of dispossession and also grant benefit u/s 30(3) of act, 2013. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioners. An affidavit is filed herewith in support of this petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are 3 the 413/6 owner of land bearing Khasra No. 413/6, area 0.060 acres, situated at Village Kansa, Tahsil Dabhra, District Sakti (CG). It is further submitted that after construction of the Ghatoi Ransa Dam, a portion of the petitioners' agricultural land has come under the submergence area of the said Dam. However, no acquisition proceedings have been drawn with respect to the petitioners' land falling under the submergence area. Therefore, it is prayed that at this stage liberty may be granted to the petitioners to file a fresh representation for redressal of their grievances, and a direction be issued to the respondent authorities (respondents No.2 & 3) to decide the representation, initiate acquisition proceedings, and grant compensation to the petitioners. 3. Learned State counsel submits that the present petition may be disposed of with appropriate direction. 4. Having considered the limited prayer made by counsel for petitioners, without entering into the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before respondent authorities along with all necessary documents and a copy of this order, within a period of 15 days from today. In the eventuality of filing such representation by the petitioners, the respondent authorities are directed to get demarcated the subject land of petitioners within a further period of 45 days from the date of filing of representation, and if it is found that the said land of petitioners has come in 4 submergence/affected area of the said Dam, then appropriate proceedings be initiated for grant of compensation to the petitioners. 5. The aforesaid proceedings with regard to acquisition and grant of compensation be concluded within a further period of 90 days from the date of demarcation of aforesaid land of petitioners. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 8. No order as to cost(s). sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha