Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30242 (CHH)

SHALINI MASIH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10927/2019 · 2026-07-30

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010448802019 2026:CGHC:33107 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10927 of 2019 1 - Shalini Masih W/o Shailesh Masih Aged About 53 Years Posted As Cook, Ashram Kalimati District- Gariyaband, Chhattigarh, R/o Village Mainpur, Dis- trict- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Edu- cation Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhatts- garh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Simga, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Project Officer Department Of Children Welfare, Simga, District Balod- abazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattis- garh 4 - District Programme Officer Department Of Women And Child Welfare, Balodabazar, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod- abazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector Balodabazar, District- Balodabazar, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 6 - Commissioner, Raipur Office Of Commissioner, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Dis- trict : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2026.08.01 12:05:36 +0530 2 For petitioner : None For Respondent/State : Dr. Surendra Dewangan, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Judge Order on Board 31.07.2026 1. Vide order dated 04.02.2026, this Court was informed that the sole pe- titioner had expired, and time was granted to take steps for bringing the legal representatives on record. However, no such steps have been taken till date. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Court is left with no other op- tion but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of pros- ecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Jyoti