2026:JHHC:9972 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11009 of 2025 Rajkamal Marik, son of Amin Marik … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Nanda, Advocate : Mr. Niranjan Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. PP --- 03/08.04.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 29.06.2025 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.99 of 2025, registered for offence under Sections 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2), 61 (2) of BNS and Section 66 (B), 66 (C ), 66(D), 84(C ) of I.T. Act, now pending in the court of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber Crime Deoghar. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 29.06.2025 and charge has already been framed on 10.12.2025. As per the allegation, there is one victim connecting the petitioner, who is alleged to have been cheated for an amount of Rs.5946/- as per the counter affidavit. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber Crime Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.99 of 2025, on the following conditions: 2026:JHHC:9972 2 (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:08.04.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:09.04.2026