D/L281 24.07.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (M) 1507 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Ranitala Police Station Case No.382 of 2025 dated 09.06.2025 under Sections 103(1)/109/118(2)/126(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and charge-sheet submitted under Sections 126(2)/109/ 103(1)/118(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Sebrahim Sk. and Anr. Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Suman Bhanja Ms. Usashi Chattopadhyay. ...for the petitioners. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Ms. Tanusree Kar. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody for more than 1 year 1 month, charges have already been framed and the witness action has commenced. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail, produces the case diary and relies upon the evidence of the eyewitnesses. I have taken into account the period of detention which may not be very vital in the case. However, another injured Firoj Sk. (CSW4) has survived. Learned trial court would prepone the evidence of CSW 4 2 and complete his evidence at the earliest. At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected. Petitioners would be at liberty to renew their prayer for bail after the evidence of CSW4 is over. With the aforesaid observations, CRM(M)1507 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)