KALU CHARAN PRADHAN @ KALU PARADHAN v. STATE OF ODISHA
ABLAPL/9067/2026 · 2026-08-07
V Narasingh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30237 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30237 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.9067 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010557642026
1. Kalu Charan Pradhan @ Kalu Paradhan
2. Duryadhan Pradhan @ Durjyodhan Pradhan …. Petitioners
Mr. S. Z. Hussain, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 07.08.2026
01.
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.554 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Satyabadi, arising out of Satyabadi P.S. Case No.302 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 296, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
3.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail. Page 2 of 4
4. Taking into account the nature of allegations qua the Petitioner No.1, this Court is not inclined to entertain the application for pre-arrest bail in respect of Petitioner No.1. However, it is directed that the Petitioner No.1 (Kalu Charan Pradhan @ Kalu Paradhan) may surrender before the learned J.M.F.C., Satyabadi in connection with the aforementioned case within one month from today. In the event of his surrender and motion for bail, the same be considered by the learned J.M.F.C., Satyabadi on merits, in the first hour of the day. In the event of rejection of the prayer for bail by the learned J.M.F.C., Satyabadi, the Petitioner No.1 is at liberty to move the higher forum for bail in the second hour on the same day. 5. On being so moved, the higher forum is requested to make an endeavor to dispose of the bail application of the Petitioner No.1 on the same day. The case diary shall be made available to the concerned courts to facilitate disposal of the bail application of the Petitioner No.1 and learned J.M.F.C., Satyabadi is called upon to transmit the case record to the higher forum in the second hour
expeditiously in the event of rejection of the bail application by him. Ground of parity, if any, may be considered by the learned court(s) below. The forums below are requested to verify the criminal antecedents of the Petitioner of any nature and the nature of the injury. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner No.1 has any criminal antecedent and the injured has suffered any grievous injury, this order shall not be given effect to. 6. So far as the ABLAPL in respect of Petitioner No.2 is concerned, taking into account the nature of allegations and the punishment prescribed, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner No.2 (Duryadhan Pradhan @ Durjyodhan Pradhan) shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent of similar nature. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner No.2 has any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to. Page 4 of 4
7.
It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 8. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. 9. U.C.C. as per rules. (V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Jina Designation: Junior Stenographer