1 CGHC010287802026 2026:CGHC:33142-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 429 of 2026 Manju Sahu @ Manjari D/o Anandram Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o Village- Amandula, Police Station And Tahsil- Malkharoda, District- Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director General Of Police Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Inspector General Of Police Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Superintendent Of Police Sakti, District- Sakti (C.G.) 5 - The Station House Officer Police Station- Malkharoda, District- Sakti (C.G.) 6 - Kamal Mairisha Sub-Inspector Sakti, In-Charge Of Dial 112, District Sakti (C.G.) Permanent R/o Village- Silyari, Block Dharsinwa, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.08.01 14:06:30 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate. For Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : Mr. Ashish Shukla, Addition Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 31 .07.2026 1. Heard Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Ashish Shukla, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 5/State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “(i) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record from the concern respondent authorities. (ii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly pleased to direct the concern respondent authorities may be taken appropriate step upon the Complaint made by petitioner and may be conduct the fair inquiry/investigation, thereafter lodged F.I.R. against the Respondent No. 06/Kamal Mairisha in accordance with law. (iii) Any other relief, which may be deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be provided in favor of the petitioner.” 3 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that despite complaint made by the petitioner, respondent authorities have not taken any action on the complaint made by the petitioner. 4. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that the grievance of the petitioner can be very well redressed before the Court below by filing an application under Section 156 (3) or 200 of the Cr.P.C. He further submits that the controversy involved in the present matter has already been decided by the High Court of Allahabad in Misc. Bench No. 24492 of 2020 : Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Home Others vide judgment and order dated 14.12.2020 as well as by this Court in WPCR No.333 of 2020 (Akhilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 12.04.2023, dismissing the said petition, hence, the present petition be also dismissed in terms of the said order. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet