1 CGHC010289032026 2026:CGHC:33191 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6979 of 2026 Mukesh Kumar Kanwar S/o Ramgopal Kanwar Aged About 25 Years Cast - Kanwar, R/o - Village - Katori, Nawgai Police Chowki - Jatga, Thana - Katgora, Tehsil - Podi Uproda, District - Korba C.G. ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Surajpur, District - Surajpur (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Shri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Advocate. For Non-Applicant : Miss Nupur Trivedi, PL. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 31/07/2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.41/2026 registered at Police Station Surajpur District Surajpur (C.G.) for the offence under Section 20 (C) of the NDPS Act. KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Date: 2026.08.01 11:52:53 +0530 2 2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 25.01.2026, the concerned police got a tip off by informer that the applicant is carrying cannabis in a car bearing No.CG.11 BD 8383. Thereafter the police conducted a raid and seized total 10.850 K.G. of cannabis from possession of the applicant and other co-accused persons. Thereafter the FIR was registered against the applicant and co-accused persons. Hence the bail application. 3. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the crime. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. The applicant is in jail since 25.1.2026. Therefore, the applicant may be released on bail. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State/non- applicant would oppose the bail application and submit that the applicant does not have any criminal antecedents and the charge sheet has been submitted against the applicant. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, and the fact that the charge sheet has already been submitted against the applicant, the applicant does not have any criminal antecedents, which is mentioned in the bail application and he is in jail since 25.1.2026 and conclusion of trial is likely to take some 3 time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the present case. 7. Let the Applicant – Mukesh Kumar Kanwar, involved in Crime No.41/2026 registered at Police Station Surajpur District Surajpur (C.G.) for the offence under Section 20 (C) of the NDPS Act, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on 4 the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicants are deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Barve