1 CGHC010292602026 2026:CGHC:32774 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 690 of 2026 Shree Salasar Balaji Ferro Alloys Private Limited Registered Office No. 220/221, Arihant Complex, Station Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh Through Its Managing Director (Wrongly Typed As Director) Namely Shri Pankaj Parakh S/o Shri Inderchand Parakh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o B-401, Ufariya Apartment, Mowa, Sardhu, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Applicant. Versus 1 - Deepak Daga S/o Late Kedarnath Aged About 55 Years R/o H. No. 442/kha, Ward No. 35 Daga Complex, Lakholi Road, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 2 - Binod Kumar Agrawal R/o Mangal Bhawan Ke Pass, Nehru Nagar, East Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh Respondent/ Defendant No. 2 (Note In The Cause Title Of The Plaint As Well As The Impugned Order The Complete Detail Of Resp. No. 2 Have Not Been Shown And Therefore, The Resp. No. 2 Has Been Impleaded As It As Shown In The Plaint The Impugned Order) ... Respondents. (cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Applicant : Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent : - (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 30/07/2026 Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.08.01 10:49:36 +0530 2 1. This is an office reference. 2. Perused the office note filed by the Registry. Learned Principal District Judge, Rajnandgaon has sent Request Letter dated 08.07.2026 seeking extension of time to decide Civil Suit No.30A/2024 in compliance of order dated 12.01.2026 passed in MCC No.25/2026 (which was filed in connection with order dated 12.06.2025 passed in MA No.86/2025), whereby, this Court has directed the concerned Court to conclude the case preferably within a period of 6 months. 3. Perusal of aforesaid PUD and order-sheets annexed with it would show that the parties themselves are not taking proper interest in expeditious disposal of the case. Therefore, learned trial Court is directed to not take lenient view in granting adjournment or time to the parties. However, on due consideration this Court is inclined to grant further time of 6 months to decide the said case. 4. With the aforesaid observation, prayer for extension of time is allowed. Further time of 6 months’ from today is granted to decide the concerned civil suit. 5. Registry shall send copy of this order to the concerned Court forthwith. 6. Accordingly, the MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay