24.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 267. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1493 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Nanoor Police Station Case No. 235/2025 dated 07.12.2025 under Sections 85/80(2)/103(2)/3(5) of BNS read with Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. And In the matter of : Sk. Badrudoja @ Babu ……Petitioner. Mr. Bitasok Banerjee Mr. Abdus Salam Ms. Debangsu Bhattacharya ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Manas Kr. Das Mr. Aniruddha Tewari ….for the Defacto. Mr. Gurudas Mitra Mr. Utsav Dutta ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about 8 months and charge sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner has been implicated as he is the husband. Learned advocate for the defacto complainant opposes the prayer for bail and submits that marriage was solemnized 8 months ago. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the parents of the deceased has 2 specifically alleged regarding the role of the present petitioner. Learned advocate also emphasizes on the time frame within which the unfortunate incident took place. I have taken into account the overall circumstances of the present case including the post-mortem report. Having regard to the detention already suffered and the charge sheet having been submitted, I am of the view that further detention of the present petitioner may not be warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Sk. Badrudoja @ Babu shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned ACJM, Birbhum. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Birbhum without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1493 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)