Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30209 (CHH)

SHRI SURENDRA SINGH HANSPAL v. MD. AAYUB

CRMP/2001/2026 · 2026-07-30

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010288952026 2026:CGHC:33152 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2001 of 2026 1 - Shri Surendra Singh Hanspal S/o Shri Jagjit Singh Hanspal Aged About 38 Years R/o Street No. 3, H. No. 9, Guru Govind Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Md. Aayub S/o Marhoom Hazi Ismail Khan Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 3, Azad Chowk, Behind Mosque, Simga, P.S. Simga, Distt. Balodabazar, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate For Respondent : Not noticed Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 31/07/2026 1. Heard. 2. Admit. 3. The complainant/petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for extension of time for compliance of order passed by this Court. 4. Vide order dated 22.09.2025 passed in ACQA No. 401/2024, the appeal was disposed of in light of decision of the Supreme Court rendered in M/s. Celestium Financial Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.08.01 11:21:28 +0530 2 Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804 and the petitioner was directed to file an appeal within a period of 60 days from 22.09.2025 before the appropriate Court which was not complied with. 5. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that due to an inadvertent bona fide mistake and communication gap between the party and counsel, the Petitioner has failed to comply with the order of this Court dated 22.09.2025; he further submits that now the petitioner is in contact with him; therefore, it is requested that the application may be allowed and 30 days’ further time may be granted for compliance with the said order. 6. In view of the above submission, the CRMP is allowed, and the Petitioner is granted 30 days’ further time from today to file an appeal before the appropriate Court, subject to payment of a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to the District Legal Services Authority, Raipur (C.G.). 7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu