Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30209 (CAL)

MIJANUR MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/16814/2026 · 2026-07-24

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21. 21. 24.07.2026 (D/L) (D/L) CT. NO. 05 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 16814 OF 2026 MIJANUR MONDAL VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Anjan Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Nirbanesh Chatterjee, Adv. Ms. Reshmi Khatun, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Suryaneel Das, AGP Ms. Anita Kundu, Adv. …For the State 1. At the time of call learned advocate representing petitioner submits that after filing of writ petition certain steps have been taken by the concerned police authority and grievance of the petitioner is redressed. 2. State respondents are represented by Mr. Das, learned Additional Government Pleader. 3. In view of submission made on behalf of petitioner, no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 4. Writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)