Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3020 (RAJ)

ANAR SINGH ALIAS NAHANE S/O BACHCHU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3703/2026 · 2026-04-28

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:17909] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3703/2026 Anar Singh Alias Nahane S/o Bachchu, R/o Barahana, Police Thana Angai, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Singh Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 28/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.486/2023 registered at Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 323, 341 and 382 IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation against the present petitioner is of snatching motorcycle, mobile phone and Rs. 25,000/-. He further submits that only one wooden stick is alleged to have been recovered from the present petitioner. No test identification parade was conducted. Petitioner is behind the bars since 23.01.2026 though twelve cases have been reported against him but in all the cases he is already on bail. Charge-sheet [2026:RJ-JP:17909] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3703/2026] has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Anar Singh Alias Nahane S/o Bachchu, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. [2026:RJ-JP:17909] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3703/2026] (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/25