SIKINDLA DEVI AND OTHERS v. KUMAR RAJEEV RANJAN COMMISSIONER SECRETARY AND OTHERS
CCP(S)/369/2025 · 2026-09-18
Sindhu Sharma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3020 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3020 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 369/2025
Sikindla Devi & Ors. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate
Vs
Kumar Rajeev Ranjan Commissioner Secretary & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nisha Kangotra, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER 18.09.2026
1. The petitioners have initiated the present contempt proceedings against the respondents for non-compliance with the order dated 01.03.2025 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 2798/2023, whereby the writ petition was disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3 to make payment of the balance amount of compensation, i.e. 20% of the total amount of compensation due to the petitioners, within a period of three months.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order dated 01.03.2025 stands complied with and, as such, nothing survives for further consideration in the present contempt petition.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the proceedings in the present contempt petition are closed.
(Sindhu Sharma) Judge Jammu 18.09.2026 Amit
Sr. No. 99