PETROS PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. The State Tax Officer (South)- III Assessment Circle
WP/19035/2026 · 2026-06-08
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30199 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30199 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 19035 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19035 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.20278 & 20279 of 2026 Petros Promoters Private Limited Represented by its Director, Mr. K. Ashok Kumar, 197/3B, 17, Amman Nagar, Denkanikottai Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri 635 109 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Tax Officer (South)- III Assessment Circle, Integrated commercial Tax Building, Ground Floor, Hosur, Krishangiri 635 109 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 03.12.2024 in Form GST DRC07 vide Ref No. ZD331224019038T bearing GSTIN 33AALCP6510G1ZK, pertaining to FY 2021-2022 issued by the respondent as arbitrary and illegal and quash the same, and further directing the respondent to redo the adjudication in accordance with law, after granting opportunity of personal hearing to us. For Petitioner(s): Ms.Mitra B For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ******** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19035 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 03.12.2024 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed long after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 50% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand subject to giving credit to about Rs.19,000/-, which was recovered pursuant to the impugned order. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand (after adjusting amounts recovered earlier) within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19035 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand.
Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the bank attachment shall stand raised. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The State Tax Officer (South)- III Assessment Circle, Integrated commercial Tax Building, Ground Floor, Hosur, Krishangiri 635 109 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19035 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 19035 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.20278 & 20279 of 2026 08-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis