Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30195 (PNJ)

SURJIT SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/21643/2026 · 2026-07-17

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 115 CWP-21643-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-17.07.2026 Surjit Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ***** VIKAS BAHL , J.(Oral) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to remove the illegal encroachment from panchayat land. Other reliefs have also been sought. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time and seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to seek alternate remedy, in accordance with law. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty aforesaid. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 17.07.2026 Geeta Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No GEETA RANI 2026.07.17 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh