Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30170 (KAR)

SRI. N. ANAND RAO v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/9294/2026 · 2026-07-20

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010436322026 NC: 2026:KHC:37151 CRL.P No. 9294 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9294 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI. N. ANAND RAO S/O SRI. RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT PLOT NO.09, SEVEN HILLS, NEAR MARKET, GANDHINAGAR, BELLARY - 583 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. Y.S. HANUMANTHA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HIGH GROUNDS POLICE STATION, BENGALURU. REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU. 2. SREEMANARAYANA S/O. AMNESHWAR RAO, Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010436322026 NC: 2026:KHC:37151 CRL.P No. 9294 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.01, HIGH POINT-1, FLAT NO.1053, CHALUKYA CIRCLE, BENGALURU PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NO.D-6, SAI BALAJI RESIDENCY, NEXT TO WOMEN'S COLLEGE, GANDHINAGAR, BELLARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. WAHEEDA M.N, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO 1. QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.41/2021 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE I A.C.J.M BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-C TO THE PETITION WHICH WAS FILED BY THE HIGH GROUNDS P.S. AGAINST THE PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 420, 506 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before the Court calling in question registration of a crime in crime No.41/2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010436322026 NC: 2026:KHC:37151 CRL.P No. 9294 of 2026 2. Heard Y.S. Hanumantha Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Waheeda M.M., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the concerned Court is not passing an order on the 'B' report, as 'B' report is filed in the year 2024 and a protest petition has been filed by the complainant immediately thereafter. Therefore, the concerned Court shall now endeavour to pass necessary orders on the protest petition, in accordance with law. 4. The learned counsel would further submit that on the strength of the subject proceedings pending, the passport authorities are not renewing the passport or granting a complete validity passport. 5. In the light of the aforesaid direction, the passport authorities shall now consider the application of the petitioner, in accordance with law. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010436322026 NC: 2026:KHC:37151 CRL.P No. 9294 of 2026 6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 74