Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30165 (CHH)

DHANARAM (DEAD) THROUGH LEAGAL HEIRS- v. MU. JAMUNA BAI (SINCE DIED) WD/O HEERA LAL

MCC/1130/2025 · 2026-07-30

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010433852025 2026:CGHC:33266 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1130 of 2025 1. Dhanaram (Dead) Through Leagal Heirs- 1A. - Chitrekha W/o Late Dhanaram, Aged About 51 Years; 1B. Anju Kashyap D/o Late Dhanaram, Aged About 37 Years; 1C. Vikas Kashyap S/o Late Dhanaram, Aged About 34 Years; 1D. Gopal Prasad Kashyap S/o Late Dhanaram, Aged About 33 Years; 2. Manaram S/o Jhaduram, Aged About 31 Years; 3. Tukeshwar S/o Jhaduram, Aged About 16 Years; 4. Dileshwar S/o Jhaduram, Aged About 13 Years; 5. Sanjay S/o Jhaduram, Aged About 11 Years Applicants No.3 to 5 are Minor Through Their Next Friend Brother Manaram Appellant No. 2. 6. Jhaduram (Died) S/o Laxman (Legal Heirs Are Already On Record). All are R/o Village Kaitha, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). ... Applicants versus 1. Mu. Jamuna Bai (Since Died) Wd/o Heera Lal 2. Ramesh Kumar (Since Died) Through Legal Heirs:- 2A. Malti W/o Late Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 60 Years 2B. Sanat Kumar S/o Late Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 40 Years; 2C. Dilip Kumar S/o Late Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 38 Years; 2D. Shivnandan S/o Late Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 36 Years; 2E. Deepak S/o Late Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 33 Years; All R/o Village Kaitha, Police Station & Tahsil Jaijaipur District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH 2 3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). ... Respondents For Applicants :- Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, Advocate. For State :- Mr. Amit Buxy, Dy. Government Advocate. SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 31.07.2026 1. Heard on I.A. No.1, application for condonation of delay in filing the instant MCC. 2. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 1681 days in filing the instant MCC is condoned. 3. Also heard on application for restoration of S.A. No.236 of 2010. 4. The applicant seeking restoration of S.A. No.236 of 2010 which was dismissed for non-compliance of order of this Court dated 29.01.2021. 5. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the instant MCC is allowed and S.A. No.236 of 2010 is directed to be restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ankit