SHRI SAI CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/13280/2026 · 2026-05-01
Jagmohan Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3016 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3016 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 111 CWP-13280-2026 Date of Decision: 01.05.2026
SHRI SAI CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR …Petitioner Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Nikhil Vats, Advocate and
Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. Deepak Vashisht, DAG, Haryana
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to release payment with respect to work carried out by it for the respondent along with interest @ 18% per annum.
2.
Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Executive Engineer, PHED-Division No.2, Rohtak submits that admitted liability would be discharged within four months from today subject to verification.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent may be subjected to interest @ 18% per annum from the date of passing bills.
SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.01 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-2-
4.
In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands
disposed of with a direction to respondent to release payment to the petitioner within four months from today. If payment is not released within aforesaid period, the respondent would be liable to pay interest @ 9% per annum from the expiry of said period. The petitioner is at liberty to approach appropriate authority qua disputed amount, if any.
5.
Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 01.05.2026 SDK
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.01 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document