Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3015 (JHR)

GAFAR ALIAS GAFFAR MIAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1015/2026 · 2026-04-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:9761] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1015 of 2026 ------ 1. Gafar @ Gaffar Mian, aged about 50 years, S/O- Newaji Mian, R/O Village- Dokidih, P.O. + P.S.- Narayanpur, District- Jamtara. 2. Charku Mian @ Charku Mian, aged about 55 years, S/O- Jumrati @ Jumradi Miyan, R/O Village- Dokidih, P.O. + P.S.- Narayanpur, District- Jamtara 3. Safik Mian, aged about 45 years, S/O- Late Budhu @ Jalil Mian, R/O Village- Dokidih, P.O. + P.S.- Narayanpur, District- Jamtara .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-07-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.07 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Section 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, 332, 333, 337, 338, 379, 153A, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being members of an unlawful assembly, attempted to murder the police personnel by pelting stones upon them while they were involved in their official duty in connection with immersion of idol and deterred the public servant- police personnel from discharging their duty. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-22 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and that they will not indulge in any offence while on bail. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 14.11.2025 as has been mentioned in para-22 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Jamtara in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.07 of 2023 with the condition that they will co- operate with the trial of the case, furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not indulge in any offence while on bail. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-07.04.2026-Animesh/