PARDEEP KUMAR v. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER
CWP/19754/2026 · 2026-07-16
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, Sanjiv Berry
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30147 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30147 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CWP-19754-2026 Date of Decision:- 16.07.2026 PARDEEP KUMAR ....Petitioner(s) Versus GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr. Mohit Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Avin Sandhu, Advocate for respondents. * * * * JASGURPREET SINGH PURI,
J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to deliver the possession of the site i.e. SCO No.83, Pocket-C, measuring 139.35 Square Metres, Sector 78, SAS Nagar (Mohali).
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that despite being entitled to possession of the aforesaid site, as described in the prayer clause of the petition, the petitioner has not been delivered possession of the same, despite having paid all the requisite dues.
3. At this stage, Ms. Avin Sandhu, Advocate, has appeared on behalf of respondent-GMADA and on instructions from Mr. Aman Gupta, Estate Officer, submitted that the respondents are ready and willing to deliver possession of the site. She further submitted that the respondents had SANDAL SHARMA 2026.07.17 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-19754-2026 -2-
earlier also been ready and willing to deliver the possession of the site, however, the petitioner never approached them for taking possession of the same.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a specific date and time may be fixed so that the petitioner may appear before respondent No. 2–Estate Officer for taking possession of the site.
5. In view of the statements made by learned counsels for the parties, the present petition stands disposed of. The petitioner shall appear before respondent No. 2–Estate Officer on 22.07.2026 at 11:00 A.M. in his office. Thereafter, the necessary formalities for handing over possession of the site shall be completed.
(JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 16.07.2026 S.Sharma i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No SANDAL SHARMA 2026.07.17 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment