Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30135 (CAL)

AZAD ALI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/22111/2024 · 2026-07-20

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20.07.2026 Sl. No.664 Ct. No.14 ss IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. No. 22111 of 2024 Azad Ali Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Gourav Das Mr. Anisur Rahman Mr. Akashdeep Nath Ms. Jahanara Begum …for the Petitioners. Mr. Brijendra Pratap Singh Mr. Asit Kumar De …for the State. Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick Mr. Biman Halder Mr. Amman Arif Ansari … for the DPSC, Uttar Dinajpur 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks direction upon the respondent authorities particularly the respondent No.4, the District Inspector of Schools (Primary Education), Uttar Dinajpur for grant of ‘A’ category scale of pay including the arrear to the petitioner on and from the date following the last date of final examination of Diploma in Elementary Education (in short, „D.El.Ed.‟) training course 2017- 2019, i.e., 17th March, 2019 in terms of Memorandum being No.209-SE(EE)/PTTI-7/2011 dated 4th March, 2 2013 issued by the Joint Secretary, School Education Department, Government of West Bengal. 3. The petitioner contends that he joined in the post of Assistant Teacher in primary school in the year 2017 as an untrained candidate. The petitioner successfully completed D.El.Ed. final examination for the session 2017-2019, the results of which was declared on 22nd May, 2019. The petitioner has been granted ‘A’ category scale of pay from 16th December, 2019. However, the petitioner is entitled to ‘A’ category scale of pay from the date following the last of final examination of D.El.Ed. training course. Hence, this writ petition. 4. Mr. Gourav Das, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the controversy as to from which date the petitioner will be entitled to ‘A’ category scale of pay has been set at rest by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in District Primary School Council, Purba Medinipur & Anr. versus Prasanta Dolai & Ors. (In Re: FMA 1029 of 2024) and other appeals and it has been held that the entitlement of ‘A’ category scale of pay shall be the date of declaration of the result. He seeks that similar benefit be extended to the petitioner in the light of the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench. 5. Mr. Brijendra Pratap Singh, learned Advocate for the State as well as Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick, learned Advocate for the District Primary School Council, Uttar 3 Dinajpur, leaves the matter to the discretion of the Court. 6. The Hon’ble Division Bench in respect of the similarly circumstanced petitioners in FMA 1029 of 2024 observed as follows: “In view thereof, the orders passed by the learned single Judge in the respective writ petitions are modified to the effect that the writ petitioner/respondent no.1 in the respective appeals shall be granted 'A' category pay-scale with effect from the date of result declaration of D. EL. Ed (online) examination held in March 2019, i.e., 22nd May, 2019 and that the arrears shall be paid to the writ petitioners by 15th December, 2025.” 7. Admittedly the petitioner is similarly circumstanced as of the petitioners in FMA 1029 of 2024. In view of the aforesaid order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench, the petitioner shall be granted ‘A’ category pay-scale, subject to verification by the authorities, with effect from the date of result declaration of D.El.Ed. (online) examination held in the month of March, 2019, i.e. 22nd May, 2019 and arrear salary, if any, shall be paid to the petitioner by end of August, 2026. 8. With the above direction, the writ petition being WPA 22111 of 2024 stands disposed of. 9. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegation made in the writ petition is deemed to be not admitted. 10. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 11. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 12. There shall be no order as to costs. 13. All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 4 14. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)