IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2118 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2024 Thana- INDUSTRIAL AREA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1 . Suresh Bhagat @ Suresh Paswan S/o Late Lalu Bhagat RO Village- Jethui, PS- Industrial Area, District- Vaishali 2. Sumitra Devi W/o Suresh Bhagat @ Suresh Paswan RO Village- Jethui, PS- Industrial Area, District- Vaishali 3 . Sarita Devi W/o Suresh Bhagat @ Suresh Paswan RO Village- Jethui, PS- Industrial Area, District- Vaishali 4. Rita Devi D/o Suresh Bhagat @ Suresh Paswan, W/o Sajan Paswan RO Village- Jethui, PS- Industrial Area, District- Vaishali 5 . Geeta Devi @ Geeta Kumari D/o Suresh Bhagat @ Suresh Paswan, W/o Raja Paswan RO Village- Jethui, PS- Industrial Area, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Himanshu Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is second anticipatory bail petition. Earlier, the petition, filed for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners, stood dismissed as withdrawn , vide order dated 02.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 90026 of 2024 . 3 . This application does not reveal any change of circumstances or new ground. 4. In view of the recent judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of G.R. Ananda Babu Vs. State of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2118 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 Tamil Nadu and Anrs reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 176, the second anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners is not maintainable. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T