Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21168 CRL.P No. 17256 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17256 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
SRI VIKAS S @ MALLIKARJUNA @ MALLIKA @ MALLA S/O SRI SRIKANTH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.25 17TH MAIN ROAD BEHIND RADHAKRISHNA SCHOOL SRINAGARA, BANASHANAKARI BENGALURU – 560 050. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MANJUNATH V., ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HANUMANTHANAGARA POLICE STATION BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU – 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL.SPP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.P.C (U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER HEREIN ON BAIL IN
Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21168 CRL.P No. 17256 of 2025
CR.NO.309/2018 OF HANUMANTHANAGAR P.S., BENGALURU, SPLIT-UP IN
SC.NO.1204/2024 BY S.C.NO.291/2019, PENDING BEFORE HON’BLE LXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-70) FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S. 143, 302, 144, 146, 147 R/W 149 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking his enlargement on bail in SC No. 291 of 2019 which is split up in S.C.No.1204 of 2024.
2. Heard Sri Manjunath V, learned counsel appearing for petitioner and Sri B N Jagadeesha, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent.
3. The petitioner gets embroiled in a crime in Crime No.309 of 2018 of Hanumanthangar police station, which is now tried by the Court of Session in SC No. 1204 of 2024. It is
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21168 CRL.P No. 17256 of 2025
not that the petitioner was not granted bail earlier. The crime was registered in the year 2018. The petitioner was enlarged on bail on police filing a charge sheet. The bail stands cancelled on the score that the petitioner failed to appear before the Court, on a non-bailable warrant being issued.
4. In the light of the fact that the petitioner had been granted bail earlier and it stood cancelled on the score that the petitioner failed to appear before the Court on particular dates, the petition deserves to succeed, while directing that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court as and when
directed or when the matter is listed.
5. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and bail that was granted to the petitioner on 23-10-2019 in Crl.P.No.6906 of 2019 is restored, with the same conditions that were ordained when bail was granted to the petitioner. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BKP/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12