IRFAN ANSARI ALIAS AJMUL ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1605/2026 · 2026-04-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3011 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3011 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:10067] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.1605 of 2026
------ Irfan Ansari @ Ajmul Ansari aged about 21 years son of Kamruddin Ansari @ Amruddin Ansari, Resident of Village – Charima, Post- Nagjua, P.S.- Kairo Charma District- Lohardaga (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Dharmendra Kr. Malityar, Advocate
Mr. Anukul Gaurav, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-08-04-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lohardaga P.S. Case No. 143 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 339, 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons was involved in commission of the offence of assisting in concealment and disposal of the stolen motorcycle, committed forgery for the purpose of cheating and used forged documents as genuine. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.08.2025 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated17.02.2026 passed in B.A. No. 10820 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner
during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Lohardaga in connection with Lohardaga P.S. Case No. 143 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 08.04.2026 Saroj/