Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30100 (CHH)

NITIN KUMAR POLIYAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/199/2020 · 2026-07-30

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CGHC010004202020 2026:CGHC:33180 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 199 of 2020 Nitin Kumar Poliyar, S/o. Shri Shiv Kumar Poliyar, Aged About 34 Years, Assistant Teacher (Nagriya Nikay), Posted At Govt. Primary School Dhourabhata ( Parpodi ) District – Bemetara, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 – Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Municipal Corporation, Nagar Palika Parishad Parpodi, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents & WPS No. 215 of 2020 Santram Sahu, S/o. Shri Jay Sahu, Aged About 32 Years, Assistant Teacher, (Nagriya Nikay), Posted At Govt. Boys Primary School Parpodi, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner ASHOK SAHU Digitally signed by ASHOK SAHU Date: 2026.07.31 16:15:18 +0530 Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 – Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Municipal Corporation, Nagar Palika Parishad Parpodi, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents For Petitioner : None present. For Respondents-State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer (Single Bench) Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 31.07.2026 1. Even in the second round of hearing, none appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner; therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss both the petitions for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ashok