Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3010 (JHR)

MANIRUDDIN ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1781/2026 · 2026-04-07

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:9781 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1781 of 2026 Maniruddin Ansari aged about 30 years, son of late Gulam Ali … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. PP. --- 06/07.04.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2025 in connection with Jamtara (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 111(2) (b), 317(2), 317(5), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of the Information and Technology Amendment Act, 2008 and Section 42(3) (e) of the Telecommunication Act, 2023 pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2025 and as per the allegation, there are three victims. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He has further submitted that no case of organized crime is made out against the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that out of three victims, one is charge sheeted witness. However, the custody of the petitioner and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent is not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid arguments and the period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara, in connection with ( 2026:JHHC:9781 ) 2 Jamtara (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 07.04.2026 Uploaded on: 08.04.2026 Binit/