MANOJ BAIRWA S/O SHRI DEVLAL BAIRWA, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/355/2026 · 2026-03-17
Anil Kumar Upman
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 301 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 301 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11313] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 355/2026
1. Manoj Bairwa S/o Shri Devlal Bairwa, R/o Mor At Bhatiyan, District Tonk (Rajasthan), Presently Residing 59, Roop Nagar, Manoharpura, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Operator Of Jokhar The Club, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Arjun Lal Meena S/o Hanuman Sahai Meena, R/o Bavdi Ki Dhani, Siroli, Dantli, Jaipur.
3. Bunty S/o Kajodmal Yadav, R/o Futala Marg, Dhani Cholai, Futala, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2. Harendra Gadwal S/o Shri Nandkishore Gadwal, R/o Village Firwasi, Ladnu, District Didwana-Kuchaman (Rajasthan).
3. Ashish S/o Shri Madan Lal, R/o Village Firwasi, Ladnu, District Didwana-Kuchaman (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Ms. Vandana Aoudichya & Mr. Ganesh Narayan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 17/03/2026
1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.679/2025 registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 189(2) of BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of
[2026:RJ-JP:11313] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-355/2026] precious judicial time and resources. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor places verification report dated 03.02.2026 received from the SHO, Police Station Jawahar Circle, District Jaipur City (East). According to which, parties have entered into compromise. The said report is taken on record.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents does not dispute the factum of compromise.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.679/2025 registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle, District Jaipur City (East), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /54