Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010505542024 NC: 2026:KHC:37690 WP No. 23863 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 23863 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1.
HOTEL KAMADHENU, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. SATHYAPRASAD D., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.226 NEW SAYYAJI RAO ROAD, MYSURU-570001.
2.
SUHANA S. ALVA, W/O. SATHYAPRASAD D., AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
3.
SHARADA S.R., W/O. LATE DAYANANDA S.R., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
4.
SATHYAPRASAD D., S/O. LATE DAYANANDA S.R., AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
PETITIONERS NO.2 TO 3 ARE R/AT 114B, VIVEKANANDA ROAD, YADAVAGIRI, MYSURU-570020. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. TRIVIKRAM S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010505542024 NC: 2026:KHC:37690 WP No. 23863 of 2024
SRI. MOHAN H.G., REGISTERED OFFICE AT RADHIKA 2ND FLOOR, LAW GARDEN ROAD, NAVRANGPURA, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT-380009.
ALSO AT NO.1078, 2ND FLOOR, 11TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560086. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.C.AVINASH, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Trivikram, counsel for the petitioners appeared through video conferencing and Sri.B.C.Avinash, counsel for caveator / respondent appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the dismissal of the petition as having become
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010505542024 NC: 2026:KHC:37690 WP No. 23863 of 2024
infructuous and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the dismissal of the petition as infructuous, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19