Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30086 (KAR)

HOTEL KAMADHENU v. HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED

WP/23863/2024 · 2026-07-22

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010505542024 NC: 2026:KHC:37690 WP No. 23863 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 23863 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. HOTEL KAMADHENU, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. SATHYAPRASAD D., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.226 NEW SAYYAJI RAO ROAD, MYSURU-570001. 2. SUHANA S. ALVA, W/O. SATHYAPRASAD D., AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 3. SHARADA S.R., W/O. LATE DAYANANDA S.R., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 4. SATHYAPRASAD D., S/O. LATE DAYANANDA S.R., AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS PETITIONERS NO.2 TO 3 ARE R/AT 114B, VIVEKANANDA ROAD, YADAVAGIRI, MYSURU-570020. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. TRIVIKRAM S., ADVOCATE) AND: HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010505542024 NC: 2026:KHC:37690 WP No. 23863 of 2024 SRI. MOHAN H.G., REGISTERED OFFICE AT RADHIKA 2ND FLOOR, LAW GARDEN ROAD, NAVRANGPURA, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT-380009. ALSO AT NO.1078, 2ND FLOOR, 11TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560086. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.C.AVINASH, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Trivikram, counsel for the petitioners appeared through video conferencing and Sri.B.C.Avinash, counsel for caveator / respondent appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the dismissal of the petition as having become - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010505542024 NC: 2026:KHC:37690 WP No. 23863 of 2024 infructuous and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the dismissal of the petition as infructuous, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19