Md. Shekh Rahamtullah v. The State Of Bihar and Ors
CWJC/8018/2018 · 2026-01-13
Rajiv Roy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30080 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30080 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8018 of 2018 ====================================================== Md. Shekh Rahamtullah Son of Late Aghanu Resident of Village - Darah, P.S. Bheja, District – Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Collector, Madhubani.
3. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani.
4. The Circle Officer, Madhepur, District Madhubani.
5. Most. Kanni Wife of Late Jahid
6. Md. Hussain Son of Late Jahid Respondent No. 5 and 6 are residents of Village - Darah, P.S. Bheja, District - Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramchandra Jha Raman, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha, SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 13-01-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of an appropriate the writ/writs order/orders in the nature of certiorari for quashing/setting aside order dated 18.12.2014/09.01.2015 contained in Annexure-4 passed in Vasgit Parcha Case No. 7/2013-14 by the Circle Officer, Madhepur within District- Madhubani by which Parcha has been issued in favour of Respondent No. 5 and 6. And further for
Patna High Court CWJC No.8018 of 2018(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/2 directing and commanding the respondent authorities to release and vacate the land of petitioner bearing Khata No. 23, Khesra No. 2148, area 0-1-17 dhur situated at Darah, P.S. Bhejha, District- Madhubani from the possession of respondent no. 5 and 6 and also hand over the said land in possession of the petitioner who is raiyat/ land holder. And further any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled from the facts and circumstances of this case.
3. Mr. Ramchandra Jha Raman, representing the petitioner submits that it will suffice that if he is allowed to approach the Collector, Madhubani for the redressal of the grievance.
4. Learned State counsel has no objection.
5. Granting said liberty and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U