HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No.84 of 2026 Farid Ur Rehman ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent Present:- Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Siddharth Bisht, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 73 of 2022, under Section 376D and 506 IPC, Police Station Banbasa, District Champawat. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that co-accused having similar role have already been granted bail/anticipatory bail. The role of the applicant is similar. 4. This fact is admitted by learned State counsel 5. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that this is a case fit for anticipatory bail. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail, subject to his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions: 2 (i) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. (iii) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the court concerned. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case, the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the court concerned. (iv) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), & (ii) above. Ravindra Maithani, J.) 20.03.2026 Jitendra