Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30073 (CAL)

UNION OF INDIA v. BODDU RAVIKUMAR

CRM(R)/27/2025 · 2026-07-24

Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24.07.2026 Item No.17 Court No.9 CHC Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Side C.R.M. (R) 27 of 2025 In the matter of : Union of India ...… petitioner Mr. Ratan Banik, Advocate Mr. Biswaraj Agarwal, Advocate …for the petitioner/CGST Mr. Akhil Biswas, Advocate Ms. Kakoli Bose, Advocate Mr. Sudhindra Das, Advocate …for the opposite party 1. Petitioner/CGST and opposite party are represented. 2. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner/CGST that after investigation chargesheet has already been submitted against the opposite party. 3. In such circumstances, he does not want to press the present application seeking cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party. 4. In view of the above submission of the petitioner, CRM(R) 27 of 2025 stands dismissed as not pressed. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) 2