IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.511 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- East Champaran ====================================================== Mr. Sajid Prawez S/o Parwez Alam Khan @ Alam Khan Resident of village - Chorma, P.S - Chorma, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 303(2), 61(2), 317(5), 317(4) and 111 of B.N.S., 2023, Section 66(C) and 66(D) of the I.T. Act as well as Sections 25(1-b)26/35 of the Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on information derived from Pratibimb Portal (a software of cyber police), the house of suspected mobile no.9162687392 was raided and accused Dipanshu and Pappu were arrested and Dipanshu confessed that the aforesaid mobile belongs to him and also that there is allegation of fraud of Rs.50,000/- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.511 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/4 committed through the aforesaid mobile, further, apart from the mobile, other articles, like, laptops, Cheques, Passbooks etc. were seized and the apprehended accused further disclosed that they received an amount of Rs.80 lacs of defrauded money, it was also disclosed that Satyam and Ayush are mastermind of the racket, who transferred the defrauded amount of cyber crime through RSN games, further disclosed the name of other associates, involved in the crime as Sanjeev, Ayush, Rohit, Abhinesh, Sumit Saurabh and Raj Kishor Ram, the apprehended accused further disclosed that at the instance of Ayush, they sent money to Sumit Saurabh, with whom other associates also deposit money, thereafter, the house of Satyam Saurabh was raided but he had absconded but from his room, one cash-counting machine, a loaded country made pistol along with 7 live cartridges, Laptop, ATM cards, Passbooks etc. were seized along with cash of Rs.7,50,000/- and a Thar vehicle, similarly the house of Satyam, Sanjeev and Sumit was also raided and articles, as detailed in the FIR, were seized, further Sumit confessed that he converted the defrauded money in USDT and also disclosed that Purushottam, Daya Shankar, Nikhil and petitioner used to transfer the defrauded money to USDT and also converted the same in Crypto Currency on very large scale, further from Purushottam, Rs.15,98,880/- along with 99,500/- Nepali currency was recovered. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.511 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 3/4 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations, as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that name of the petitioner came in confession of Sumit in police custody, which does not have any evidentiary value. It is also submitted that Sumit in his confessional statement disclosed that he converted the defrauded money in USDT and Purushottam, Daya Shankar, Nikhil and petitioner used to transfer the defrauded money to USDT and also converted the same in Crypto currency on very large scale. It is further submitted that during the course of investigation, apart from confessional statement of Sumit, no material has transpired connecting the petitioner with the offence on which the learned APP submits that it appears that the petitioner is evading the law when his interrogation is required on which the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence. 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.511 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 4/4 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- IV, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No.92 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 6. It is made clear that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, namely, Parwez Alam Khan @ Alam Khan. 7. It is further made clear that in the event if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not cooperating in the investigation, in that event, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. 8. It is further made clear that if charge sheet is submitted connecting the petitioner with the offence, apart from confession, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall loose its effect. Sanjay/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T