Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30067 (CAL)

MD. SABIR AHAMED @ SABIR SK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/1959/2026 · 2026-07-23

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 656. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (A) 1959 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliganj Police Station Case No. 258 of 2025 dated 21.03.2025 under Sections 126(2)/117(2)/118(1)/109/74/76/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Md. Sabir Ahamed @ Sabir Sk. & Anr. ……Petitioners. Mr. Sumanta Das ……for the Petitioners. Mr. Bankim Pal ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case out of previous rivalry. They being innocent, they may be granted the relief prayed for. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the injured as well as the injury report. I have taken into account the statement of the injured which points to one Ajijul Sk. who has inflicted the vital blows. Petitioners were present along with others. 2 Having considered that petitioners have been implicated for being present and the principal assailant is a different person namely, Ajijul Sk., I am inclined to accept the prayer of the petitioners. As such, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the charge sheet has already been submitted this order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of 6 weeks. Accordingly, CRM (A) 1959 of 2026 is allowed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)