M.Karthikeyan v. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/13327/2026 · 2026-06-05
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30065 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30065 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 13327 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 13327 of 2026 M.Karthikeyan ..Petitioner Vs State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Manalmedu Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District. (Crime No. 218/2026) ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 218 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Rajprabhu For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 194 and 108 of BNS Act, 2023 r/w Section 12 of Protection of Child From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 in Crime No.218 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 13327 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the mother of the victim girl aged about 16 years. The petitioner, aged about 42 years, was working as an English Teacher in a Government Higher Secondary School. It is alleged that due to the stress caused by the activities of the petitioner, the victim girl committed suicide on 27.04.2026. Hence, the case was registered.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and that he has been falsely implicated in the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no previous case and no bad antecedents. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the investigation is still at a preliminary stage. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the
learned counsel on either side.
6. This Court is of the view that considering the nature of the allegation and the fact that the investigation is at a preliminary stage, this Court is not https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 13327 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage.
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 05-06-2026 NSL To
1. The Inspector of Police, Manalmedu Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 13327 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. NSL CRL OP No. 13327 of 2026 05-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis