Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3004 (JHR)

NAND LAL YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/1404/2018 · 2026-04-07

Sri Ananda Sen

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9757 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1404 of 2018 ------- Nand Lal Yadav s/o Late Sant lal Mahto aged about 48 years resident of Vill- Singhraydih, Mohanpur, Mohanpur Hat, P.O & P.S-Mohanpur, Dist.-Deoghar .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary Revenue, Registration & Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, H.E.C, P.O & P.S-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Secretary Revenue, Registration & Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, H.E.C, P.O & P.S-Dhurwa, Dist.- Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O & P.S-Deoghar, Dist.-Deoghar 5. The Circle Officer, Mohanpur, P.O & P.S-Mohanpur, Dist.-Deoghar. 6. Smt. Radha Rani Singh w/o Dr. Chhattrasal Singh resident of Lakshmi Niwas, Lakshmipur Chowk, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar … Respondents. ------- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Amrit Kumar Kisku, AC to GA-V For the Resp. No.6 : Mr. Sudarshan Srivastava, Advocate ------ 06/ 07.04.2026: By way of filing this writ application, the petitioner is challenging a registered lease deed on several grounds. 2. Admittedly, the petitioner is not claiming lease over the land in question. He is challenging the lease deed which has been executed and registered in favour of the respondent No.6. 3. Since the petitioner is not claiming any relief for himself, in my opinion, this writ petition is not maintainable. 4. If the petitioner so wishes, he may file a Public Interest Litigation or approach the appropriate forum. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 7th April, 2026 Madhav/- Uploaded on:09/04/2026