Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3004 (BOM)

ABHIJEET JALINDAR RAJLE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/9517/2026 · 2026-08-06

Shri Ajit B Kadethankar, Shri Kishore C Sant

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) wp9517.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 WRIT PETITION NO. 9517 OF 2026 ABHIJEET JALINDAR RAJLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS Mr. G.B. Patunkar h/f. Mr. S.M. Vibhute, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.R. Kale, AGP for the respondent-State. Mr. A.S. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ. DATE : 06.08.2026 PC :- 01. The claim of the petitioner is pending validation before respondent No.2 Committee. Now he is appointed by respondent No.3 as Electrical Assistant by order dated 10.02.2026. A condition is put in the appointment order that the petitioner has to submit caste validity certificate within six months from the date of order. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that it is not in the hands of the petitioner to get the validity certificate issued within the stipulated period. He is already before the Scrutiny Committee. 02. Considering the above, the Scrutiny Committee is requested to decide the claim of the petitioner as early as possible and preferably within six months from today. 2026:BHC-AUG:34180-DB ( 2 ) wp9517.26 03. For a period of six months or till decision of the Scrutiny Committee, whichever is earlier, no adverse action shall be taken against the petitioner solely on the basis of non-production of validity certificate. 04. This Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2026/Aug26/wp9517.26