SRS PEARL UNITY SEC 5 PALWAL RWA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/17411/2026 · 2026-07-13
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30025 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30025 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-17411-2026 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.115
CWP-17411-2026
Date of Decision: 13.07.2026
SRS Pearl Unity Sec 5 Palwal
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: Mr. Hakam Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
(through video conferencing)
Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Arvind Moudgil, Senior Advocate, with
Mr. Tajeshwar Singh Sullar, Central Government Counsel,
Union of India, for respondent no.9.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL)
The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to execute/register the conveyance deeds in favour of the genuine homebuyers/allottees of Tower – C, SRS Pearl Floors, Sector 5, Palwal, in terms of the orders dated 27.07.2023 and 11.03.2026, Annexures P-21 and P-29, respectively.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before respondent no.5. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case the said respondent is directed to decide its pending representation(s), dated 30.04.2026 and 06.05.2026, Annexures P-33 and P-34, respectively, in a specified period.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Learned State counsel accepts notice and submits that the pending representation(s), dated 30.04.2026 and 06.05.2026, will be decided MANINDER 2026.07.16 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-17411-2026 2
by respondent no.5/Sub Registrar-cum-Tehsildar, Palwal, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within three months.
5.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.
6.
Ordered accordingly.
7.
In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of `50,000 to the petitioner.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
13.07.2026 Maninder
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
MANINDER 2026.07.16 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment