Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30025 (PNJ)

SRS PEARL UNITY SEC 5 PALWAL RWA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/17411/2026 · 2026-07-13

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-17411-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.115 CWP-17411-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 SRS Pearl Unity Sec 5 Palwal .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Hakam Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. (through video conferencing) Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Arvind Moudgil, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Tajeshwar Singh Sullar, Central Government Counsel, Union of India, for respondent no.9. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to execute/register the conveyance deeds in favour of the genuine homebuyers/allottees of Tower – C, SRS Pearl Floors, Sector 5, Palwal, in terms of the orders dated 27.07.2023 and 11.03.2026, Annexures P-21 and P-29, respectively. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before respondent no.5. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case the said respondent is directed to decide its pending representation(s), dated 30.04.2026 and 06.05.2026, Annexures P-33 and P-34, respectively, in a specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Learned State counsel accepts notice and submits that the pending representation(s), dated 30.04.2026 and 06.05.2026, will be decided MANINDER 2026.07.16 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-17411-2026 2 by respondent no.5/Sub Registrar-cum-Tehsildar, Palwal, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within three months. 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of `50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 13.07.2026 Maninder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANINDER 2026.07.16 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment