Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010288882026
2026:CGHC:32635
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1188 of 2026 Permanand Yadav S/o Bansidhar Yadav Aged About 30 Years R/o Raikera, Police Station Bagicha, District Jashpur C.G.
... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Bagicha, District – Jashpur, C.G.
... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Sumit Singh, Dy. Advocate General. Hon'ble
Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board 29.07.2026
1. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 164/2026 registered at Police Station – Bagicha, District – Jashpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(2), 336, 338, 339 and 61(2)(a) of the BNS.
2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that some land dispute is going on in between the Bhagwano Ram and Bansidhar, so, the Bhagwano has filed an appeal with the allegation that in the year 2010 he has purchased 1.06 Acres of land from the Bansidhar as Khasra no. 49/4 and after the aforesaid registered sale deed the Tahsildar has directed to Mutate the name of Bhagwano vide order dated 15.05.2012, against that the Bansidhar has filed an appeal before the SDO but the same has been dismissed on 26.06.2012, thereafter the Bansidhar has filed RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI
2 a civil Suit, which has been registered as Civil Suit no. 05/A/2015 and vide order dated 15.09.2017 the Civil Suit has been Dismissed, then an appeal has been preferred by the Bansidhar and subsequently on the basis of the compromise in between the parties, the appeal has been withdrawn, but the name of the Bhagwano has not been shown in the revenue records and the Bansidhar has taken advantage of the aforesaid fact and vide registered sale deed dated 18.10.2024 sold the land to the applicant by the Bansidhar from Khasra no. 49/4 area 0.627 Acre and accordingly the name of the applicant has been duly recorded in the revenue record. Then, the Bhagwano, who has purchased the land prior to the Leeladhar and the parmanand, he has filed an appeal for mutation and the learned Sub Divisional Officer, vide
order dated 04.06.2026, allowed the appeal filed by the Bhagwano and
directed the Tahsildar to lodge a report against the present applicant. Hence, this application.
3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 14.07.2026 in MCRCA No.1092/2026. Therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail on the ground of parity.
4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application but could not dispute the fact that the co-accused person has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, and the case of the applicant is identical to that of the co-accused.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record.
3
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the case diary as well as the material available on record, this Court finds that the co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 14.07.2026 in MCRCA No.1092/2026, at this stage without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be granted anticipatory bail in this case, on the ground of parity.
7. Accordingly, the instant MCRCA is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant – Permanand Yadav, on executing a personal bond with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- (a) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court. (b) The Applicant shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial. (c) The Applicant shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. (d)The Applicant and the surety shall submit a copy of their adhaar card alongwith a colored postcard full size photo having printed the adhaar number on it, which shall be verified by the trial Court. (e)The Applicant shall not involve themself in any offence of similar nature in future. Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE Rajshekhar