Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30013 (MAD)

I.Manohar v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./988/2026 · 2026-06-05

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.No.988 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN WP.Crl.No.988 of 2026 I.Manohar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore 2.Inspector of Police, Perur Police Station, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore 3.P.Samiappan (third respondent impleaded as per order dated 05.06.2026 in WPMP.Crl.No.426 of 2026 in WP.Crl.No.988 of 2026) ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition(Crl.) filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 01.04.2026 and take necessary action to protect the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property and consequently direct the second respondent Inspector of Police, Perur Police Station Coimbatore not to interfere or cause interference, directly or indirectly with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of the property situated at S.F.No.613/2, Kuniyamuthur Village, Coimbatore https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.988 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sakthivel For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER This writ petition has been filed praying to issue a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 01.04.2026 and to take necessary action to protect the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property and consequently to direct the second respondent - Inspector of Police, Perur Police Station Coimbatore not to interfere or cause interference, directly or indirectly with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of the property situated at S.F.No.613/2, Kuniyamuthur Village, Coimbatore 2. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the writ petition, the second respondent is directed to conduct enquiry on the complaint dated 01.04.2026 of the petitioner seeking police protection, after issuance of summon to the petitioner & the third respondent and giving them opportunity of personal hearing, and to pass orders on the said complaint on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.988 of 2026 3. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 05.06.2026 Index : Yes/No (2/2) Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.988 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore 2.Inspector of Police, Perur Police Station, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras WP . Crl. No. 988 of 202 6 05.06.2026 (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis