24.07.2026 Court No.34 S/L.11 sg CRR 3226 of 2023 In the matter of : Satish Jhunjhunwala & Anr. Petitioners. Mr. Ayan Bhattacharya, sr.adv. Ms. Sanchari Chakrabortyl Mr. Dadil Naushad Ms. Avishikta Biswas …for the petitioners. Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, sr.adv. Mr. Satadru Lahiri Mr. S. Azam …for the O.P.No.2. Mr. Kallol Mondal Mr. Pritam Roy Ms. Samira Grewal …for the State. 1. Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the learned senior advocate, Mr. Ayan Bhattacharya that during pendency of this revisional application investigation has concluded and closure of report has been submitted and hence this revisional application has become infructuous. 3. State is represented. Learned advocate representing the State submits that in terms of memo of evidence no sufficient evidence were collected and hence no circumstantial evidences to submit the charge sheet in this case. Hence learned advocate appearing for the State is permitted to submit final report 2 mistake of fact with a prayer for discharge the alleged persons in this case. 4. Let the memo of evidence be kept with the record. In terms of the above development, let this revisional application being CRR 3226 of 2023 be dismissed as infructuous. 5. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of the Calcutta High Court. [Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.]