IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16522 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2025 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District- Begusarai ====================================================== Subodh Yadav S/o Late Bijul Yadav Resident of village- Bahloriya, ward no. 9, P.S.- Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sarvottam Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 27-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in conneciton with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No.308 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he along with Rajan had gone to see Goddess Kali Puja on 20.10.2025 at 8 P.M. and Rajan started video-graphing the occasion, which was objected by Sanjiv and when they refused, the named accused persons assaulted them and informant suffered injury on head on account of assault by rod by petitioner and the accused persons also snatched his mobile and locket. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16522 of 2026(3) dt.27-04-2026 2/2 informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to video-graphing the occasion of Puja, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is further submitted that no doubt petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant causing injury on head but then from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant also alleges that all accused persons assaulted him. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that there is specific allegation against this petitioner of assaulting the informant and the injury on nasal bone has been opined to be grievous in nature which is a vital part of the body and investigation is continuing. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T