1 2026:CGHC:6219 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1266 of 2025 • Shrenik Kumar Jain S/o Late Sureshchand Kotdiya, Aged About 47 Years R/o Kamthi Line, Lane No. 03, Ward No. 27, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 3. Sub Divisioinal Officer (Revenue), Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 4. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 5. Prabhat Kumar Jain, S/o Late Pukhraj Jain, Aged About 58 Years R/o Ramadhin Marg, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 6. Abhay Kotdiyar, S/o Late Subhashchand Kotdiyar, Aged About 47 Years R/o Sadar Bazar, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 7. Sharad Kotdiyar, S/o Late Subhashchand Kotdiyar, Aged About 45 Years R/o Sadar Bazar, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 8. Anand Kotdiyar, S/o Late Subhashchand Kotdiyar, Aged About 43 Years R/o Sadar Bazar, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 9. Abhilasha, W/o Anurag, Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Gadarwala, Tahsil And District Narsingpur (M.P.). ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, G.A. For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Nitesh Jain, Advocate. For Respondents No.6 to 9 : Mr. Gopal Swaroop Gupta, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 04/02/2026 DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 1. Heard on I.A. No.3/2026, application for withdrawal of the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that certain factual aspect has not been properly pleaded in the writ petition and subsequent development has been taken place during the pendency of this writ petition, which cannot be made by the amendment, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file better petition with proper pleadings, prayer and documents. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents have not raised any objection with regard to the aforesaid application. 4. In view of above submissions made by the respective parties, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. 5. Interlocutory application(s), pending if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Deepti Jha