Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 300 (AP)

GRANDHI SEETHA RATNAM v. TIPPA PEDDA PULLA RAO

AS/818/2019 · 2026-04-05

V Srinivas

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010379022019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS I.A.NO.1 OF 2026 IN/AND A.S.No.818 of 2019 Between: 1. GRANDHI SEETHA RATNAM, W/O. GOKKAVARAPU SUDHAKAR AGED 32 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 34-1-21, RAGHAVENDRA NILAYAM, DODDIPATLA VAN STREET, TANUKU - 534211 ...APPELLANT AND 1. TIPPA PEDDA PULLA RAO, S/O. NAMASSIVAYYA AGED 50 YEARS R/O. DOOR NO. 8-16, VADALI, PENUGONDA MANDAL, TANUKU. 2. TIPPA KOTA SUNDARAMMA, W/O. YOGA KUMAR, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 8-16, VADALI, PENUGONDA MANDAL, TANUKU. 3. ATYAM SATYA SRINIVAS, S/O. VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA AGED 48 YEARS, RIO. DOOR NO. 8- 16-41, MOTTUPALLI VARI STREET, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM. 4. THE BRANCH MANAGER, KARUR VYSYA BANK BHIMAVARAM, BHMV. S.C.J.C. ...RESPONDENT(S): To allow the appeal and set aside the judgment and decree dated 16.07.2019 in O.S.No.15 of 2015 passed by the Learned VI Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Tanuku, West Godavari, and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner G.P.A. holder of G. Sudhakar to represent me in the present appeal and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to record the compromise and pass a decree in terms of the compromise in the above Appeal Suit i.e, A.S.No. 818 of 2019 and pass Counsel for the Appellant: VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SARASCHANDRA BABU JAKKAMSETTY 2. O N KRISHNA The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT: Both the parties i.e., appellant as well respondents jointly filed the I.A.No.1 of 2026 under Order 23 Rule 3 of C.P.C. to record the joint compromise memo, which is filed along with this application, and to pass a decree in terms of compromise as mentioned in the said joint compromise memo. 2. Both parties present before the Court, they admitted the terms of compromise mentioned in the said joint 3 compromise memo as true and correct, gave consent to record the same. 3. Both the parties have filed their photostate-copy of Aadhaar card and they were identified by their respective learned counsel. 4. Pursuant to the above, I.A.No.1 of 2026 is ordered by recording compromise between the parties as per the terms of compromise mentioned in the joint compromise memo, which shall be part and parcel of the decree and judgment in the present Appeal Suit No.818 of 2019. 5. Since the joint compromise memo is accepted by both the parties and in view of the above mentioned circumstances, the appeal in A.S.No.818 of 2019 is disposed of by granting a decree in-terms of compromise arrived at I.A.No.1 of 2026. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date: 06.04.2026 Krs 4 17 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS I.A.NO.1 OF 2026 IN/AND A.S.No.818 of 2019 ( Common Judgment ) DATE: 06.04.2026 Krs