HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 148/2026 UT of J&K ….. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA. q vs Mohd. Amin Shah and Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 20.02.2026 01. Petitioner has invoked inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 BNSS for cancellation of interim bail granted by learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kishtwar [“the trial Court”], vide impugned order dated 17.07.2023 as also order dated 30.10.2023, vide which aforesaid interim bail came to be made absolute. Petitioner has questioned the impugned orders primarily on the ground that both the orders are non- speaking. 02. A perusal of impugned order dated 17.07.2023, vide which respondent came to be admitted on interim bail reveals that investigation of case was already complete and even the remand Court refused to extend remand of the respondent and he was committed to judicial custody. On this premise, respondent came to be enlarged on interim bail and vide order dated 30.10.2023 since investigation had culminated in the presentation of final report against the respondent, the interim bail came to be made absolute. Sr. No. 117 2 CRM(M) No. 148/2026 03. In view of above, I do not find any illegality or impropriety in both the orders, impugned in the present petition. 04. Hence, present petition is dismissed along with connected application(s). (Rajesh Sekhri) Judge Jammu 20.02.2026 Sushant