Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29977 (CAL)

BIPLAB CHOUDHURY @ BIPLOB CHOUDHURY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2044/2026 · 2026-07-23

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23.07.2026 Serial no. 677 [G.S.D] CRM (A) 2044 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Gangarampur PS Case No. 0296 of 2026 dated 18.05.2026 u/s 323/379/427/435/447/448/506/34 of the IPC. -And- In the matter of : Biplab Choudhury @ Biplob Choudhury … Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandip Chakraborty Mr.Kaustav Das Mr. Subham Ghosh Ms. Payel Das … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Subhasish Pachhal Mr. Soumalya Dutta … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the incident complained of is of the year 2021 and the petitioner has been implicated because of change of the administration. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and produces the case diary. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary particularly the genesis of the case which portrays the incident of 2021. 2 Having considered the overall circumstances, I am of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner [Biplab Choudhury @ Biplob Choudhury] be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner shall meet with the investigating officer of the case as and when called for by the Investigating Officer. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2044 of 2026 is disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3