Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
23.07.2026 Serial no. 678 [G.S.D]
CRM (A) 2045 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with English Bazar PS Case No. 2352 of 2025 dated 09.11.2025 u/s 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Hakim Sekh
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Amaan Deep Gupta Ms. Pipasa Chakraborty
… for the petitioner(s)
Ms. R. S. Roy Mr. Rohan Bavishi
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated on the basis of statement of a co-accused and, although, recovery was made from different persons, but, the police authorities implicated the present petitioner and are searching for him. Learned advocate for the State produces the case diary and submits that it is not only the statement of the co- accused but there are materials to suggest including the call data records which establish the communication of the present petitioner with that of the principal accused.
2 Having regard to the same, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2045 of 2026 is dismissed. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)