23.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 655. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (A) 1958 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Ranitala Police Station Case No. 631 of 2025 dated 01.10.2025 under sections 109/117(2)/118(1)/118(2)/126(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Golam Murtuja ……Petitioner. Mr. Sayan Mukherjee ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Shalini Bairagi ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. There has been dilution of the sections in the charge sheet. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary and drawn the attention of the Court to the statement of the injured as well as the injury report. I find that the injury is grievous. Incised wound has been inflicted and the statement of the injured specifically states the petitioner to be the principal assailant. 2 Petitioner is not similarly situated as the other accused persons. Consequently, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in CRM (A) 1958 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)